<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Yes Vote - NZ Referendum on Child Discipline 2009 &#187; physical abuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yesvote.org.nz/tag/physical-abuse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yesvote.org.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>

		<item>
		<title>Russell Brown: The son that got away</title>
		<link>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/09/03/russell-brown-the-son-that-got-away/</link>
		<comments>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/09/03/russell-brown-the-son-that-got-away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 01:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Yes Vote Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famly first]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horse whip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riding crop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russell brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timaru]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yesvote.org.nz/?p=2292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Russell Brown has been in contact with the son of the "riding crop lady", and posted some of the conversation on <a href="http://publicaddress.net/6145#post6145" target="_blank">Public Address</a>.  The son left home because of the physical abuse he received there, and has been through "countless family court hearings ... trying to get my brothers and sisters removed from her care".  He's angry with Family First's attempt to use his mother and family as a political catalyst. </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell Brown has been in contact with the son of the &#8220;riding crop lady&#8221;, and posted some of the conversation on <a href="http://publicaddress.net/6145#post6145" target="_blank">Public Address</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s a good deal that can&#8217;t be said about the so-called &#8220;Timaru Lady&#8221;, whose Section 59 acquittal on charges of assaulting her son with a riding crop and a cane really began the recent smacking madness. The permanent suppression order the followed her acquittal has seen to that.</p>
<p>But I can say that she has an older son in Auckland, with whom I have occasionally been in contact. His first email to me, last year, included this passage:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Let me start by firstly saying I left home during high school because of the physical abuse and have nothing further to do with my mother other than through countless family court hearings with me trying to get my brothers and sisters removed from her care.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Anyway the point of my email is that I talked to Family First several times years ago and they were aware of [redacted]&#8216;s past and I even gave them more informed details but they were more than happy just to brush it over and use her as a political catalyst. It makes me really angry and I did fire back at them at the time they were supporting violence against our children. But however. You will find a couple more organisations such as Anti-Cyfs organisations &#8230;. that fully support her. I really think someone should bring this to light.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>For more, see the full post at <a href="http://publicaddress.net/6145#post6145" target="_blank">Public Address</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/09/03/russell-brown-the-son-that-got-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study links smacking to physical abuse</title>
		<link>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/04/19/study-links-smacking-to-physical-abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/04/19/study-links-smacking-to-physical-abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 04:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Yes Vote Team</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spanking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of north carlolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zolotor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yesvote.org.nz/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://uncnews.unc.edu/news/health-and-medicine/unc-study-shows-link-between-spanking-and-physical-abuse.html" target="_blank">study published by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</a> in August 2008, mothers who reported that they or their partner spanked their child in the past year were nearly three times more likely to state that they also used harsher forms of punishment than those who say their child was not spanked.</p>

<p>Such punishments included behaviors considered physically abusive by the researchers, such as beating, burning, kicking, hitting with an object somewhere other than the buttocks, or shaking a child less than 2 years old.</p>

<p>“In addition, increases in the frequency of spanking are associated with increased odds of abuse, and mothers who report spanking on the buttocks with an object – such as a belt or a switch – are nine times more likely to report abuse, compared to mothers who report no spanking with an object,” said Adam J. Zolotor, M.D., the study’s lead author and an assistant professor in the department of family medicine in the UNC School of Medicine.</p>

[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/rPFz2n1Qt7I" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.med.unc.edu/fammed/news/unc-study-shows-link-between-spanking-and-physical-abuse" target="_blank">study published by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill</a> in August 2008, mothers who reported that they or their partner spanked their child in the past year were nearly three times more likely to state that they also used harsher forms of punishment than those who say their child was not spanked.</p>
<p>Such punishments included behaviors considered physically abusive by the researchers, such as beating, burning, kicking, hitting with an object somewhere other than the buttocks, or shaking a child less than 2 years old.</p>
<p>“In addition, increases in the frequency of spanking are associated with increased odds of abuse, and mothers who report spanking on the buttocks with an object – such as a belt or a switch – are nine times more likely to report abuse, compared to mothers who report no spanking with an object,” said Adam J. Zolotor, M.D., the study’s lead author and an assistant professor in the department of family medicine in the UNC School of Medicine.</p>
<p>[kml_flashembed movie="http://www.youtube.com/v/rPFz2n1Qt7I" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yesvote.org.nz/2009/04/19/study-links-smacking-to-physical-abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

